Electoral Relevance: Senate District 12 Edition

Before Senator Ed Kasemeyer made his public announcement that he would not seek re-election, this blog commented on his attenuated electoral standing.  There was already a sense that his connection to the local activists wasn’t as strong as it once was.  This is not an atypical pattern… sometimes even serious legislators, in the twilight of their careers, simply opt to focus on different aspects of the job.  The zeal for campaigning wanes as the public servant throws herself or himself into committee work.  No value judgment here, just a recognition that Kasemeyer’s career arc is a familiar one.

It is when they endorse a would-be successor that the situation rises to the level of Vaguely Interesting.   How much support can they truly provide another candidate?  The answer is that it depends on how many voters such individuals can move in the “right direction.”  Remember: all of the resources put into political campaigns (organization, money, reputational capital, etc…) are ultimately geared towards the One True Currency in a Republic (as it determines who wins and who loses): Votes. 

There are precious few old-school machines these days, and Ed Kasemeyer is no Richard J. Daley.  How many voters will be moved by his apparently imminent public backing of Mary Kay Sigaty?  I would argue very few.  Of course, in a close election, when the battle is presumably being waged between the 40 yard lines, a few votes takes on greater importance. 

That said, his endorsement was relatively late-in-the-game (although still enough time for a direct mail piece and for door-to-door communications) and, perhaps more importantly, it probably serves to galvanize progressive support for Dr. Clarence Lam.  Kasemeyer’s poor handling of HB1299 (the manner of electing Howard County Board of Education members) is indicative of someone who has lost touch with the base.  In politics, for every action, there might not be a truly equal reaction…but there is an opposite one.  I think a certain number of undecided voters are going to view the Kasemeyer endorsement in a negative light, these voters will largely shift to Lam while some will not cast a ballot for Senate District 12.  In short, Sigaty may pick up a handful of votes because of this endorsement, but she will also lose some.  

Frankly, Kasemeyer's best move from a “legacy” perspective (putting aside his prior legislative accomplishments) would have been to stay on the sidelines, endorse no one, and let the voters choose his successor.  By wading into this contest, he is further demonstrating a lack of situational awareness.  Like a late-career Willie Mays, some folks just don’t know when to quit.

In solidarity.

A First Draft of the Evolving Wisdom: Ervin Edition

With the shocking and tragic passing of Baltimore County Executive Kevin Kamenetz a mere half fortnight ago, and with the calendar and Democracy stopping for no one, former Montgomery County Councilmember Valerie Ervin announced today that she would run for Governor (with former Baltimore County School Board Member Marisol Johnson joining her on the ticket as the LG candidate).

So what do we know and what do we deem likely?

With the first televised Democratic gubernatorial debate slated for Monday, there will probably be considerable movement over the next several days as the new field finds an initial (and completely fleeting) equilibrium.  So let’s do some back-of-the-envelope handicapping.

Without the benefit of recent public polling, let’s say that Kamenetz was at 20% of the Democratic primary vote.  Informed instinct tells me that around one third of that number isn’t going to settle on another candidate right away. I know where I think they will go, but let’s hold off on that speculation for now.  I estimate that one third to forty percent of the 20% will shift (at least temporarily) to Ervin, as the standard-bearer of the original ticket. That leaves, roughly, a quarter to one third of the vote that will gravitate to another candidate…will they stay there? Some will, some won’t.

If I had to divvy up the remaining slice of the Kamenetz electorate in this model, I would anticipate that Shea and Ross would be the first stop for many (call it a combined 15% of the total between the two). I would place Vignarajah in the same ballpark, pulling in around 6% - 8% of the Kamenetz vote.  Finally, a couple might opt for Baker as another Establishment/Executive candidate (although voters had this option previously and went with Kamenetz), another handful might go for Madaleno, and I don’t see much overlap between Kamenetz and Jealous.

That still leaves 80% of the vote – which was either with other candidates or undecided. The last publically available poll back in February showed 32% undecided, that still sounds correct but that number will start dwindling, rather quickly and very soon.  Tack on another one percent apiece for Jaffe and one percent for Jones, add it to the 20% for Kamenetz, and we are at 54% of the Democratic primary electorate. Let’s look at the other 46% for a moment, those who have indicated a preference for a particular candidate other than Kamenetz, before going back to the Undecideds…

Short-term (and possibly long-term) impact:

Ervin is a Montgomery County progressive, I believe she chips away significantly at Madaleno’s geographic base, which will compel him to focus his resources and energies in MoCo at a time when he should be expanding his support elsewhere.   She has solid left credentials that could appeal to a number of Jealous voters, particularly if his campaign stagnates or implodes. A known figure in the DC Metro area, she can pull some votes out of PG County as well, giving voters another solid alternative to Baker.

Yes, clever and oh-so-dear readers, the present author is well aware that Ms. Ervin is a woman.  So yes, Ms. Vignarajah is no longer the only woman seeking the Democratic gubernatorial nomination.  However, Vignarajah…as talented as she is…was never going to secure 100% of the women’s vote in the primary.  And with @ 60% of the Democratic primary electorate being women, there is plenty of room for both candidates in the field (not to mention the other @ 40% of the D electorate that are men - since both candidates are not competing solely for the votes of women).  It makes the road to Annapolis perhaps slightly more challenging for Vignarajah, temporarily (not permanently), but Vignarajah has proven that she is a serious contender who is skilled on the campaign trail.  That is why I believe the biggest losers, as a result of Ervin’s entry into the race, are Madaleno and Jealous. 

Turning to the Undecideds, so much will be decided between now and Election Day, as voter interest increases and folks enter decision-making mode.  I still maintain that Vignarajah is extremely well positioned to capture the lion’s share of the Undecideds, as well as pull votes from other candidates, and thus rise rapidly in the polls in the coming weeks.  Meanwhile, Ervin will pull votes from other progressives, but not nearly enough to make her the consensus liberal choice.  This is why I believe that Vignarajah and Baker will end up being the top two vote-getters in the Democratic field, followed by Jealous, Ervin, and possibly Shea or Ross (one of these two will catch a favorable wind, but not both), and Madaleno all clumped together.

Let’s end with both taglines.  Stay tuned, as more will follow.  In Solidarity.

      

Get Me Roger Stone – A Brief Movie Review

I watched “Get Me Roger Stone” on Netflix last night.

For those who don’t know who Roger Stone is, he is an extremely talented, sybaritic, Nixon-worshipping, Republican political operative and Trump advisor who loves…yet has been burned by…the limelight.

While I respect his sartorial choices, Mr. Stone’s relentless amorality is, shall we say, more than moderately off-putting.  He is an almost perfect caricature of a “win at all costs & get paid handsomely for it” consultant because that is, essentially, who he has been for over 40 years. 

Had Trump never sought the presidency, this GOP-pish dandy would have primarily been remembered for:

1)    his rise to prominence in the 1970s along with New Right activists and operators such as Terry Dolan, Paul Weyrich, and Richard Viguerie (Stone was an enfant terrible going back to the Watergate-era).   

2)    The “cashing out” years with the lobbying firm of Black, Manafort, and Stone where they provided political counsel to corporations, Republican candidates and office-holders, and foreign leaders and governments, including more than a few brutal dictatorships. 

3)    The sex scandal that derailed Stone’s career (which incidentally occurred in the same year as Dick Morris’ fall).

4)    His comeback in 2000 with his efforts to help secure Florida for Bush.

5)    His work (!?) on behalf of Reverend Sharpton’s 2004 presidential campaign, his involvement in New York politics and the Spitzer imbroglio, and his Libertarian flirtations.

But his on-again, off-again, but mostly on-again long-standing relationship with Trump is troubling because his corrosive style of politicking meshes so horrifically well with Trump’s eagerness to exploit the basest instincts within the electorate.  So we find ourselves in this nightmare that Stone, in the coda of his career, helped bring about.  Thus, any sympathy for Stone, as a rogue-ish figure, is eviscerated by the all-too-present reality that he helped elect a dangerous, unfit, and unqualified demagogue to the White House. 

One can only hope that history will repeat itself and that Trump will be removed from office like Stone’s idol, Richard Nixon.  That would make for a fitting epilogue to this film.

In solidarity.