Ho. Co. 04-19: “Authority to Impose Fees for Use of Disposable Bags”

First, I am elated to see local Republicans embracing the concept of progressivity in taxation.  “From each according to his ability,” eh comrades?  And before the pickers of nit chime in, yes, this is a “fee” and not a “tax,” but the point remains unchanged.

Second, while all of you are mucking about with second century tech like “bags,” why is no one discussing the logical alternative?  Transporters. When I want to move objects through space (note to self: perhaps time?) quickly and efficiently, I can think of no better innovation than transporters.  Safeway, beam over my Crunch ‘n Munch.

Third, it has become clear that some of us within the community have fallen under the pernicious influence of Big Bag.  Pity.

I would like to state, for the record and in all seriousness, that I am inclined to support this bill.  While an outright ban on plastic bags, at the state level, would be ideal…I see no reason to oppose the “good” if the “excellent” is not yet an option.  I would like the revenue raised from this fee to be dedicated to environmental clean-up efforts.  Furthermore, while I am sensitive to the argument regarding regressivity, as far as the proposed plastic bag fees are concerned, I don’t see a better point-of-sale fee alternative (pay what you think is fair??).  However, if you assume 10 disposable bags per week, that works out to $26 a year; money is money of course yet this amount seems just onerous enough to encourage people to acquire reusable bags that are better for the environment – which is the point, really.

I would like to review more data on, for example, how well Montgomery County’s system has worked before I would consider giving Dr. Hill’s bill my full-throated support. That said, it reads like a sound public policy measure.  I encourage our County lawmakers to give it serious consideration.    

  

In solidarity.

Beautiful Losers?

Based on the comments I received to my post from this morning, I was going to add a comment.  500+ words later, i realized it should be a full post, so here you go:

My focus here is on pointing out that "multiple-time" Democratic seekers of the presidency  - since the Civil War - have not fared well.  

If you ran for the office and lost once (regardless of whether or not you obtained the nomination), your second (or third) run did not end in winning the presidency.

My point is that Democrats have had electoral success when nominating people who have not sought the presidency previously.

Let’s look back at multiple-time Democratic candidacies since the post-Civil War era. I will try to avoid "favorite son" and “eccentric” candidacies but this list is not meant to be exhaustive.

General Winfield Scott Hancock – candidate in 1868 (lost to Seymour at the Convention) and 1876 (lost to Tilden at the Convention), finally received the nomination in 1880.  Lost in a fairly close election to James Garfield.

Thomas Bayard.  Lost at the Convention in both 1880 and 1884 (to Hancock and Cleveland, respectively).

Williams Jennings Bryan.  Three-time nominee, lost to McKinley twice (1896 and 1900) and Taft once (1908) in the General Elections.

Alfred E. Smith, lost at the Convention in 1920 (Cox) and 1924 (Davis) and in the General Election in 1928 (Hoover), and again at the Convention in 1932 (FDR).

Richard Russell – lost at the Convention in 1948 (Truman) and 1952 (Stevenson)

Adlai Stevenson – twice the nominee (1952 and 1956, lost to Eisenhower both times).  Lost the nomination in 1960 (JFK).

George Wallace – best known for 1972 and 1976 but he also entered some primaries in 1964 (most notably Wisconsin).  Failed to secure the nomination all three times.

Hubert Humphrey – 1968 nominee – failed to win the nomination in 1972.

Eugene McCarthy – fabled 1968 campaign, ran as a Democrat in 1972 and 1992 (the latter was not serious), also as an independent in 1976. Never won a Democratic nomination or general election.

Scoop Jackson – failed to get the nomination in both 1972 and 1976.

Jerry Brown – ran in 1976, 1980, and 1992.  Didn’t win the nomination in all three attempts.

George McGovern – nominee in 1972, didn’t come close to getting the nomination in 1984.

Fred Harris – ran for the nomination in 1972 and 1976, no success in either cycle.

Terry Sanford – sought the nomination in 1972 and (briefly) 1976.  No luck either time.

Gary Hart – ran in 1984 and 1988, close the first time, a dismal showing the second time for reasons many of us will remember.

Jesse Jackson – ran in 1984 and 1988, basically third behind Mondale and second behind Dukakis.

Al Gore – 1988 and 2000.  Nothing else need be said about the second run. That almost broke the pattern.

Dick Gephardt – 1988 and 2004, didn’t win the nomination either time.

Dennis Kucinich – 2004 and 2008.  Distant showings both times.

John Edwards – 2004 and 2008.  Ugh.

So – based on the track record, it is fair to ask what this means for Joe Biden (1988, 2008), Hillary Clinton (2008, 2016), John Kerry (2004), Martin O’Malley (2016), Lincoln Chafee (2016), or even Jerry Brown (1976, 1980, and 1992) should one, some, or all of them run in 2020.

Republicans, meanwhile, have had some success with multiple-time candidates:  just focusing on some more recent presidencies: Nixon in 1968 (after 1960). Reagan in 1980 (after both 1968 and especially 1976).  GHW Bush in 1988 (after 1980). 

Getting Real

What is past isn’t always prologue, but Democrats can learn from our history.

I have written about this before; however, as the topic was also briefly and recently mentioned on a local podcast known to all, it bears repeating:

Since the Civil War, the only non-incumbent Democratic presidential candidates who have won (with the exception of Grover Cleveland’s non-consecutive second term) were first-time presidential candidates.

Here is the list.  See for yourself:

1884    Grover Cleveland (first-timer/won)

1892    Grover Cleveland (but he already served one term as president/won)

1912    Woodrow Wilson (first-timer/won)

1932    Franklin D. Roosevelt (first-timer/won)

            [1948 – Harry S. Truman ran for election while serving as president/won]

1960    John F. Kennedy (first-timer/won)

[1964 – Lyndon B. Johnson (sought the office before) ran for election while serving as president/won]

1976    Jimmy Carter (first-timer/won)

1992    Bill Clinton (first-timer/won)

2008    Barack Obama (first-timer/won)

So what should the Democratic party look for in an ideal nominee for 2020?  A fresh face, new and bold progressive ideas, and an insistence on reality-based governance.

To that end, a framing of Trump as a phony [a “reality show” president as opposed to a “real” president] could be another interesting campaign narrative.  It exposes Trump’s essential hollowness while reminding voters that genuine challenges require actual, mature leadership.

In other 2020 news, as of this writing, I have nothing to say about State Senator Richard Ojeda (WV) and his long-shot bid for the White House…aside from one point.  If we are going to consider nominating a state legislator for a spot on the ticket, then why not former State Senator Nina Turner (OH)?  Compared to Senator Bernie Sanders (VT), I think she would be a better option for the Democratic Left in 2020.

In solidarity.