Originally posted in mid-December 2016. I pulled it for a variety of reasons. Here is the post, as it was written:
Of the seven closest presidential elections in U.S. history, as determined by requiring the fewest number of vote flips to give the other major candidate a majority in the Electoral College (since the popular vote began to be recorded in the 1824 presidential election), three have occurred in the last five elections.
Of the seven closest presidential elections in U.S. history, as determined by requiring the fewest number of vote flips to give the other major candidate a majority in the Electoral College (since the popular vote began to be recorded in the 1824 presidential election), three have occurred in the last five elections.
In eras of relative partisan parity at the national level,
close elections will happen. Such was
the case in the late 19th century.
Such is the case now.
Of those seven closest elections, the losing candidate won the
popular vote in three of them, Gore in 2000, Tilden in 1876, and Clinton in
2016.
Small, and sometimes large, events can make a
difference. Gore’s lackluster debate
performances, Ralph Nader, and some ballot design choices in Florida cost him
the 2000 election. Tilden
was defeated in an election marred by violence, threats of violence, and
fraudulent activities throughout the unreconstructed South, requiring an
Electoral Commission to resolve the matter (along with some backroom dealing better
known as the Compromise of 1877).
However, these issues were home-grown.
Clinton’s case is different from the other two as it represents a situation where a
foreign power apparently sought to influence our presidential election and, by
doing so, potentially changed the outcome.
This author supports the bipartisan call to investigate
Russian involvement in our presidential elections. Foreign interference in our electoral process
cannot be countenanced. Further, if
after taking office, it is proven that the current presumptive PEOTUS was aware
of, and actively supported, such efforts, the U.S. Congress, in accordance with
their Constitutional responsibilities, should begin impeachment proceedings.
Closest presidential elections in U.S. history:
National Popular National Popular Votes
to Flip
Vote
Difference Vote % lead
1. 2000 Gore + 543, 895 Gore
+ 0.5% 269 (.00025%)
2.
1884 Cleveland
+57,577 Cleveland +0.6% 524
(.0052%)
3. 1876 Tilden +254,235 Tilden
+3.0% 445 (.00529%)
4.
1916 Wilson
+578,140 Wilson +3.1% 1,711 (.009%)
5.
1960 Kennedy
+112,827 Kennedy +0.17% 12,236 (.018%)
6. 2016 Clinton +2,840,337 Clinton
+2.1% 38,599 (.028%)
7.
2004 Bush
+3,010,610 Bush +2.5% 59,300 (.048%)
Stay tuned, as more will follow.
No comments:
Post a Comment