Scenes from the Columbia Democratic Club endorsement meeting
(and beyond).
1)
Who was the Democratic state legislative
candidate with the MAGA cap skulking about the parking garage? They never made it inside the Roger Carter
Community Center (thanks to S. MacCune for the eagle-eyed sighting and tip)!
2)
When I was recently called regarding a political
survey, I pressed the interviewer for the name of the firm fielding the
poll. I heard it as “SSI,” which is the
acronym for Survey Sampling International, which is a known brand in the survey
research space. Over the years, I have retained SSI’s services to obtain listed
telephone samples for various opinion research studies. That said, I am wondering if the telephone
interviewer actually said, “SSSI,” which stands for Scientific Systems and
Software International. Who runs that
company? The website shows two members
of the leadership team, both with the last name of Siddiqui, one being Nayab…the
husband of Dr. Janet Siddiqui, candidate for Howard County Council (4th
District). The survey itself was
well-crafted, not flawless, but good enough to be of professional quality. That is one mark in the “probably SSI”
column. However, the interviewer was not
so skilled, flubbing some names (most notably the pronunciation of “Deb Jung”). Then the Mrs. received a call, I believe later
on that same day, asking if she would participate in a survey, it sounded like
the same interviewer. I would think that
SSI would know that we resided in the same household, and standard political
polling best practices would dictate interviewing no more than one respondent at
the same address as part of the same survey.
So perhaps it wasn’t SSI.
Now, I heard reports that folks in
other Council Districts were being called to participate in a survey around the
same time. Why would SSSI, if it was
that firm dialing voters, be engaged in data collection outside of the 4th? If it was them, with whom were they sharing
the findings? Granted, perhaps it was
SSI and not SSSI, I suppose we shall learn soon enough by looking through
campaign finance filings.
3)
One concluding item, how many Board of Education
candidates showed up yesterday? Two,
perhaps three? I heard Sabina Taj’s excellent remarks…and I saw Anita Pandey outside of the building when her name was called
(there is something to be said about the immense role of luck in political
campaigns). My point is this…yes I know
it is a non-partisan race. But guess
what, Tex? In order to win, these BoE candidates
can’t rely on just the votes of unaffiliated voters. They need the votes of those who affiliate with
political parties. And there were, at
any given moment, around 100 very likely voters…elected officials, community
activists, all-around-influencers… all congregated in one spot…and several BoE
candidates opted to not swing by and make the rounds? In all fairness, perhaps some thought their
time better spent elsewhere, say….knocking on doors on a gorgeous
Saturday. I get that. Or, in certain cases, perhaps some deemed a
Columbia Democratic Club event to be poorly aligned with their own partisan
beliefs/inclinations. So, the questions
should be asked: who wasn’t in the room and why?
In solidarity.
No comments:
Post a Comment