The Howard County Police Department (HCPD) released a
statement this morning that said, in part, that “there is no evidence this
incident occurred.”
Since I raised awareness by writing about the controversy,
it is appropriate to note the latest developments. So there you have it.
I believe it is important to bear a few larger points in
mind:
1)
One of the reasons the original poster’s account
was shared so widely across social media (and thus came to the present author’s
attention) is because the events described were fundamentally plausible. As we
know from being attentive news consumers, people of color in the United States are,
every day, compelled to deal with racial discrimination that manifests itself
in any number of ways. Shopping while
black is a real phenomenon, as is police misconduct which disproportionally impacts
minority communities.
2)
There is a general principle: just because no
evidence is uncovered, it doesn’t mean that nothing happened. It means a specific allegation or allegations
is/are unproven. Turning to this specific case, it now appears quite possible
that these alleged events did not occur or that the facts regarding the incident
are substantially different from the version shared on social media. The broader point is that for far too long and
far too often, the default position for authority figures in this country has
been to deny, deflect, and/or minimize wrongs committed against people of
color. This is why I and others said
there needed to be an investigation.
Based on the account provided by the HCPD, it appears as though a
thorough investigation has taken place.
3)
How people respond to this alleged incident, and
its aftermath, is quite telling. Some
folks will be quick to lambast the original poster. Many of these individuals are silent when it
comes to allegations of racial discrimination.
They need to ask themselves and each other why they are more apt to believe
some people compared to others.
4)
An event very similar to the one described by
the original poster could occur today or tomorrow, in another part of the
country or right here in Columbia. I
maintain, especially in light of the “couponing while black” incident out of
Chicago, that CVS and their customers would benefit if their employees
participated in racial bias training. Furthermore,
I believe those in law enforcement positions need to undergo bias training at
regular intervals to better equip them to understand and protect the
communities they serve.
5)
It is unfortunate if the original poster deliberately told
untruths or embellished a story. One wonders what the motivation might have
been to do so, if she did, in fact, prevaricate or otherwise spin a yarn. My Midwestern sensibilities say, if this is
so, that she might want to consider apologizing to CVS and the HCPD. Again, I don’t know her or the facts beyond
what has been reported. I wasn’t at the CVS and I am not inside of her head.
6)
Regardless of the specifics of this particular instance,
it is imperative to remain vigilant against discriminatory behaviors. With so many racist Americans feeling
emboldened to act out and harm others, mindful anti-racists must be prepared to
confront such behaviors…ones engaged in by individuals as well as by institutions.
So there it stands. I
still consider this to be a story-in-progress…with more than a little fog surrounding
it. If CVS and the HCPD acted as
reported, then they behaved properly, responsibly, and professionally in this
matter. One last thing: from a communications
standpoint, CVS could and should have done a better job getting their narrative
out. Silence is not a smart strategy.
In solidarity.
No comments:
Post a Comment