I was at the coffee shop, wearing my Alexandria
Ocasio-Cortez t-shirt (Made in the USA!) when a gent across the table asked me,
“Are you from New York?”
Remembering my apparel choice, I looked up and replied, “Oh,
no…I’m just a supporter of her campaign.”
He paused for moment. “Well,” he began, “I am not a fan of her
politics…”
I quickly scanned my environment for something I could
weaponize, for defensive purposes, just in case this chat went south in a hurry. The coffee was definitely not scalding. Not
an option. My laptop mouse was wireless
so I couldn’t use it as a garrote. My
halberd was in the car. Guess it’s Krav
Maga time…fascist blood, clean-up in aisle 3.
Wait, this coffee shop doesn’t have aisles. None of them
do!
But he continued, “but I do like how she raises money from
small donors. There is too much special
interest money in politics.”
I nodded. The likelihood of
fisticuffs breaking out seemed somewhat lower.
“Yes, there is,” I responded, “and she definitely stands against the greater
concentration of wealth in our society, so her campaign is ‘people-powered.’ It has to be.”
This exchange, which happened three weeks ago, drifted back
into my mind today. You see, I read
about the $5,000 check that Raj Kathuria’s campaign received from a donor
employed by Greenwood Hospitality, a company which “is engaged in the
acquisition, repositioning, and management of full-service and select-service
hotels.” Interesting. That single donation, which was received on
5/20/18, accounted for 58% of the Schedule 1 contributions that the Kathuria
campaign received in that filing period (Pre-Primary 2 Gubernatorial, May 16,
2018 – June 10, 2018). It looks like the
same donor (same name & address, but showing an occupation of “retired”)
gave Kathuria’s campaign a total of $700 in three separate donations in an earlier campaign finance reporting period (as listed on the 1/10/2018 Annual Report).
This donor and Mr. Kathuria are the two resident agents named on
the Articles of Incorporation for a Limited Liability Company whose stated
purpose is to be a “Real Estate Holding Company.” And according to a letter that has been posted online, this company is seemingly looking to develop a plot of land right here in Howard County.
Now, many Republicans and Democrats have taken developer
money to help fund their campaigns. That doesn’t necessarily make them stooges
to those interests. Such donations, legal and properly reported, don’t in and
of themselves present a prima facie case of corruption.
My position is apparently nuanced insofar as I don’t believe
that all developers are evil, nor is all development bad. That said, if I were
a candidate for County Council, I wouldn’t accept their contributions (note: I
can’t imagine they would be that interested in cutting checks to such a
campaign). And I wouldn't be trying to develop parcels while running for the Council.
My point is this:
some voters care very deeply about this issue, and this includes
Republican, Democratic, Unaffiliated, and other party voters. So if you live in County Council District
One, and you want a candidate who doesn’t accept developer money, only one
Council candidate fits that description: Liz Walsh.
Something to keep in mind as we approach Early Voting
season…
In solidarity.
No comments:
Post a Comment