Déjà Vu
Could you be the dream that I once knew
Is it you
Déjà Vu
Could you be the dream that might come true
Shining through
I keep remembering me
I keep remembering you
Is it you
Déjà Vu
Could you be the dream that might come true
Shining through
I keep remembering me
I keep remembering you
Déjà Vu
- Lyrics by
Isaac Hayes and Adrienne Anderson. Performed by Dionne Warwick. Produced by B.
Manilow
What concerns me most about the most recent, incarnation of
the Hillary Clinton for President movement is captured succinctly by the name
of the highly visible Super PAC extolling her virtues, Ready for Hillary.
It all feels oddly familiar.
A campaign, or in this case, a proto-campaign, that seems more focused
on the candidate than on what she or he might deliver.
Of course this is a grotesquely unfair criticism. Hillary Clinton is not a candidate, at least
not yet.
The problem is her past.
In 2007 - 2008, she ran largely on a solid resume and the perceived
strength of her brand. She trusted that
those elements, along with a top-flight campaign team and oodles of ready money,
would be sufficient to clinch a first ballot nomination.
Depending on your perspective, a tragic or a fortunate (and
possibly hilarious) thing happened next.
Some member or members of her quite well-paid campaign team - reportedly - forgot how delegates are allocated
in Democratic primaries and caucuses. This is important as delegates ultimately determine
who receives the nomination. They were
playing for high stakes and some key person or people (who shall not be named here)
couldn't be bothered to thumb through a rulebook. Figuratively speaking, of course. At least that is how the story was covered. In the fog of the fight, who knows where the truth resides?
She did catch a run of bad luck. The American electorate was looking for a
clean break from the Bush years…and her candidacy represented not so much a
fresh start but a risorgimento of the
previous Administration, one that still elicited mixed emotions, even from a
fair number of Democrats.
Enter then-Senator Barack Obama and the Politics of
Change. He seized a moment, in part
because he had a theme larger than himself – while still amplifying his
biography – and because voters trusted that he would deliver on that promise.
Even then-Governor Clinton knew, in 1992, that he needed
something beyond his record. His
campaign famously employed a compelling messaging troika: “Change versus more
of the same,” “It’s the economy stupid,” and “Don’t forget health care.”
Fast forward to the present day. Some heavy-hitting Clinton backers decide to
launch a vehicle promoting Hillary Clinton as a potential presidential
candidate. Instead of linking it
something actual voters care about or even a broad theme that suggests the
outlines of a vision, they opt for “Ready for Hillary.”
When I first head that name, I thought: Are they criticizing
voters for, presumably, not being ready for Hillary in 2008? Are they saying,
in so many words, you were children but now it’s time to grow up? Are they mocking us? Hardly the inspirational stuff of “Yes We
Can.” More akin to “Why Didn’t You
Before?”
I know, I know. A
Super PAC is not a presidential campaign.
But if you look at the roster of folks associated with Ready for
Hillary, it is enough to give one pause.
If she runs, will she be a better candidate this time around? Will she make the campaign about something
larger than her admittedly impressive credentials? How will she Connect?
Or will we see an imitation of Clinton 2008? She could probably get away with it, minus
the ridiculous unforced errors, at least in the Democratic nominating
process. Democrats are so concerned
about locking in the accomplishments of the Obama Administration, they want as
close to a sure-fire winner as possible.
There is a measure of risk aversion and, on paper, Hillary Clinton
offers the best path to 270 electoral votes…. possibly even a mandate in 2016,
depending on how the next two years shape up.
In any event, I hope that the brain trust advising Team
Hillary is smart enough to learn from the past, but not dwell in it.
Stay tuned, as more will follow.
No comments:
Post a Comment