Highlights with 110 of 124 precincts reporting:
-
Once again, the HCEA demonstrated its electoral
intelligence and clout. They endorsed
three strong Board of Education candidates, who emerged as the top three
vote-getters. 45.7% of the total BoE
votes cast (179, 469 and counting…bearing in mind that voters could vote for up
to three candidates) were for HCEA-backed candidates.
-
Coombs, Delmont-Small, and Ellis were smart to
focus their campaigns on positive, reform-centric themes.
-
Giles clearly made an attempt to create some
distance between herself and the other incumbents. One could argue that this modified
triangulation strategy succeeded only in reinforcing the anti-incumbent frame.
-
With two Board of Education incumbents losing
their re-election bids, the question becomes:
what is the best vehicle for ensuring Siddiqui’s defeat in November? With five very good challenger options, some
strategic voting might prove necessary in the general election to ensure a clean sweep.
-
It’s time for Sanders voters (I was one) to
recognize that Clinton is the best and only hope for progressives who wish to
build upon the Obama Administration’s successes.
-
I was hoping that Edwards would be more
competitive in Howard County. That said,
Van Hollen's nomination should ensure that Maryland is
represented by two Democrats in the U.S. Senate in the next Congress.
Stay tuned, as more will follow.
"With five very good challenger options, some strategic voting might prove necessary in the general election to ensure a clean sweep." I share this view.
ReplyDelete