Recently, I have come across some social media posts
castigating a certain Board of Education candidate for (allegedly) expressing
partisan preferences and/or having supporters who are active members of a
certain political party.
First, these same people expressing this faux-outrage tend
to align themselves with a party different from the BoE candidate in
question. Second, they seem to have had
no problem supporting other candidates in the primary election whose values
clearly reflect that of a particular political party. So we are dealing with a toxic recipe involving
hypocrisy, disingenuousness, and naïveté (feigned or authentic).
We have to deal with the world as it is. This means that people seeking local public
office, even “non-partisan” races, might…just might…possess a worldview
involving how best we can govern ourselves in a constitutional republic. Are they supposed to hide their beliefs? I would think transparency advocates would
find that odious. Are they supposed to
step into some form of transmogrifier that strips them of any partisan
proclivities? I would imagine that such
an action, if it were possible, would be repellent to folks across the
ideological spectrum.
But to call someone “not ethical” solely because they draw
support from a wide range of citizens, including many who identify with a
political party, or because they choose to express their beliefs is beyond the
pale. Voters have a right to judge
candidates based on whatever criteria they deem important. I, for one, am glad when candidates are open
and honest about their Weltanschauung. It tells me something about who they are and
how they view the world, which I find instructive in assessing how they might
respond to dealing with a public policy challenge.
In solidarity.
No comments:
Post a Comment