From the Pleasantly Festooned Volcano Lair of S. MacCune
[A subduction zone near you…]
Just like how Bruce Dickinson wanted, nay, needed more
cowbell, the readership numbers tell the tale:
you are clearly demanding more Slats.
Fortunately, what with “Sparty”
and his December schedule, I am in a singular position to generate the content
you seek. It’s like the Christmas of ’83
all over again, back when I was the only licensed Cabbage Patch Kids distributor
in all of Belgrade. Hauled in a
yacht-load of dinars. Used the proceeds
to invest in Zastava Automobiles, maker of the Yugo. It was a sound business decision…for a while.
So MoveOn.org conducted a straw poll of its members regarding 2020 Democratic
presidential campaign preferences. The
results can be found here.
Here is what is noteworthy:
1)
So Someone else/DK/Other placed first,
28.8%. That is to be expected. It’s important to remember that Jimmy Carter
won the Straw Poll organized by The Des Moines Register at the
Jefferson-Jackson dinner in Ames in ‘75 with only 23% of the vote and it was a huge
boost to his candidacy. Reporting on the
event, The New York Times’ own R.W. Apple noted that “Mr. Carter, whose
Presidential aspirations have been considered laughable by many Washington
experts, won 23 per cent of the total.”
Oh how quickly Conventional Wisdom can be upended. Carter went on to place first amongst the candidates in the Iowa
caucuses with 27%, behind Uncommitted (37%), but he established himself as a
serious contender who would go on to win both the nomination and the General
Election.
2)
Beto O'Rourke (15.6%) placed first. Like Mick Jagger, he is running hot...at the moment. He also occupies what has historically been a
“golden” position for Democratic candidates:
progressives think he is a progressive; moderates/centrists believe he is
a moderate/centrist. That is the formula
that worked for Carter and Bill Clinton, and (to a somewhat lesser extent) for Kerry
and (arguably) for Hillary Clinton in ’16.
Greater scrutiny, by the media and by his Democratic opponents, should
he enter the race, may imperil his current perceived positioning, but many would-be D presidential
aspirants would love to have such problems.
3) Joe Biden (14.9%).
Do NOT read this as a sign that centrists are resurgent. Regardless of Joe’s voting history in the ‘70s,
‘80s, and ‘90s, a fair number of those who indicate a preference for the former
Vice President are viewing him through the Obama lens, which gives him a more
progressive tinge. One thing is certain,
in a contested primary, his entire record will be discussed and dissected…at
length.
4)
Bernie Sanders (13.1%).
In 2016, the vast majority of MoveOn members backed Sanders over
Clinton. Should the Senator from Vermont
be concerned about a drop-off in support?
Not really. In 2016, Sanders was
the obvious choice for most progressives.
Now, MoveOn members and other left-of-center voters face many choices
and folks (the ones paying attention at this point at any rate) are doing some
browsing. No harm in that…but one would expect to see his numbers climb amongst
MoveOn members shortly after a Sanders “I’m in” announcement. If he stagnates with this constituency, he
will have a hard time rolling into the Convention with a majority of delegates.
5)
Kamala Harris (10%). Again, she is not a down-the-line liberal on
certain issues (most notably, one should review her complete record on
law-and-order and civil liberties issues) but, right now, she is a favorite
among progressives. On a debate stage
with candidates such as Sanders or Warren or Brown, she probably wants to hold
a “practical progressive” sort of positioning, but that will be a hard fought
space on the continuum. Remains a candidate with a great deal of potential upside - and who can rally the entire party around her.
6)
Elizabeth Warren (6.4%). Personal opinion: she should have run in 2016. I think she has lost some of her luster over
the past couple of years. Frankly, she
should have polled better amongst MoveOn members, considering her national
profile.
7)
Sherrod Brown (2.9%). Speaking of national profile, he doesn’t have
much of one, yet, so the fact that he finished ahead of Bloomberg and Booker is
all gravy for him.
8)
Amy Klobuchar (2.8%). Good recent visibility. Swing-ish state in a key region. Feels like a candidate who could slowly build
a solid base of support among progressives, with a low-key approach that would
contrast well with Trump’s over-the-top demeanor.
9)
Michael Bloomberg (2.7%). Pass.
10) Cory
Booker (2.6%). I have a feeling that he
is the second or third choice of many current Beto voters, which would explain
his fairly unimpressive showing. Still,
he is my current pick for the potential D candidate most likely to change
messaging strategies the most between now and Iowa.
No comments:
Post a Comment