Presidential campaigns are defined both by those who choose
to run, as well as those who opt against running.
For example, the race for the 1976 Democratic presidential
nomination might have taken a far different path had either Senator Walter
Mondale located the “fire in the belly” he deemed necessary to enter the fray,
or if Senator Ted Kennedy decided to seek the presidency that cycle.
Or if Senator Joe Biden ran in 1984…he would likely have
likely cut deeply into what became Gary Hart’s base, while also attracting a
certain number of Mondale supporters. Of
course both Biden and Hart experienced their own problems in ’88.
Thinking about 1988, would Al Gore still have emerged as a
top-vote getter (after Mike Dukakis and Jesse Jackson) had Bill Clinton been in
the field as well? Would Dukakis have gotten anywhere if Mario Cuomo said, “I’m
in?”
And flipping the script on the previous cycle’s scenario
outlined above, would Bill Clinton have won the nomination in 1992, as damaged
and flawed as he was, had Al Gore been available as an active alternative?
Would Paul Wellstone have fared better against Al Gore than
Bill Bradley in 2000? What if Joe Biden
or Dick Gephardt had been presidential candidates that cycle?
Or what if Hillary Clinton ran for the White House in 2004?
Or if Gore (again) followed up on his 2000 campaign in an effort to have a
re-match against W.? Would John Kerry
have been able to obtain the Democratic nomination if either of those two
sought it?
My point is all of this is that some names being floated as
potential 2020 Democratic presidential aspirants, including at least one or two
heavy-hitters, may decide to forgo a run this time around. There are many reasons for this. The time is not right for themselves and/or
their family. They see no clear path
to the nomination. They would rather
wait for 2024 and an open seat (on the assumption that Trump somehow manages to
serve two full terms). They are not ready
to enter the meat grinder. The “Invisible
Primary” isn’t going as well as expected for them (media attention, staffing,
fundraising, etc…).
You want predictions? Fine.
While Cory Booker is currently making moves as a soon-to-be-presidential
candidate, it would not surprise me if he took a pass on 2020. He is young enough to run down the road and
he is up for re-election in 2020.
Granted, bearing in mind recent changes to NJ election laws, he can pull
a Bentsen and run for both President (or Vice President) and the U.S. Senate,
so that removed one potential issue. I
still believe he is likely to seek the presidency in 2020, but I don’t yet see
it as an automatic bet.
For different reasons, I think Joe Biden is not a mortal
lock to run in 2020. With a Democratic
party looking to the future, do they really want as the standard-bearer someone
who came to DC two years before the Watergate Babies took office and who has
been mentioned as a possible presidential candidate since 1984, the year Night Court began airing? He and his brain trust must be pondering that
question, recognizing that Biden is currently basking in the glow provided by
serving as President Barack Obama’s veep.
What happens when the focus shifts to Biden’s full record? Does he want to risk ending his long public
service career on a down note, perhaps tarnishing his Elder Statesperson
standing, for one more shot at the Big Chair?
Finally, while I believe the progressive electorate is large
enough to support a field that includes both Senator Bernie Sanders and Senator
Elizabeth Warren, I don’t believe both of them will seek the nomination in
2020. This cycle has all of the makings
of Bernie’s Last Run (unless a 2024 re-election campaign is a possibility). Meanwhile, Senator Warren doesn’t yet seem
like someone who actually wants to run for President. She clearly wants to accomplish substantive
reforms, but she doesn’t strike me as someone who believes that they need to be a resident of the house at 1600 Pennsylvania to do so.
Booker. Biden. Warren.
At least one and possibly two will not buy the ticket for the 2020 ride.
The next few weeks will be a critical time as many
candidates and their families are discussing The Big Decision and finalizing
their go/no-go plans. Those who announce
“early” (before 2/28/19) will help shape the field and influence the choices of
those who will make their intentions known in the spring.
So many possibilities, so many what-ifs. All that can be known with certainty is that,
somewhere in Iowa, at this very moment, five people at a diner are sipping
coffee and patiently listening to John Delaney explain his vision for
America.
And so it goes.
In solidarity.
This is why I can't support Cory Booker for President or any ticket with him on it. From the "OnTheIssues" site, these are some of Booker's past positions on education:
ReplyDeleteUrban school districts are beholden to public worker union. (Sep 2015)
Star fundraiser for Democrats for Education Reform. (Sep 2015)
Ensure that college tuition is not a long-term burden. (Nov 2013)
Pre-school for 3-year-olds; more teacher empowerment. (Nov 2013)
Fundamental right to high quality public education. (Nov 2013)
Newark Workshops got $1.3M in Pell Grants. (Nov 2013)
Supports "Race to the Top" education reform. (Aug 2013)
Supports school voucher proposal, like other Democrats. (Aug 2013)
Brother runs a charter school in inner-city Memphis. (Dec 2012)
Arranged $100M school grant from Facebook founder Zuckerberg. (Jun 2012)
Supports school vouchers. (May 2012)
2010: Appointed to oversee $100M donation to Newark schools. (Feb 2011)
OpEd: $100M gift to Newark schools was a publicity sellout. (Feb 2011)
Supervises Newark schools by gubernatorial appointment. (Feb 2011)
$120 million for "Teachers Village" where educators live. (Sep 2010)
Founded the Newark Charter School Fund. (Feb 2010)
Charters & alternatives for persistently failing schools. (May 2009)
Vouchers and charters can work in inner cities. (Feb 2001)
Make two years of community college free. (Jul 2015)
(Search for Cory Booker On The Issues and you'll find this.)